Behaviour

Three reds in a row, and then the fourth trade

Streaks happen by chance. The behaviour after them is the part worth measuring.

2026-05-19 · 5 min read

Three consecutive losses is not evidence of anything by itself; random sequences produce runs all the time. What is not random is what many traders do next.

Measure the trade after the streak

Size, time gap, and outcome. Compare it with your median trade. In plenty of books the fourth trade after a losing run is both the largest and the fastest, which is a difficult combination to defend.

Median size by position in a losing streak
₹0₹4k₹7k₹11k₹15k ₹4kTrade 1₹4kAfter 1 loss₹6kAfter 2 losses₹11kAfter 3 losses₹13kAfter 4 losses

Rupees at risk, median across a year. Illustrative journal data, not a live book and not a performance claim.

A cool-off rule only counts if it pre-existed

If you wrote "stop after three" in the morning, the fourth trade is a measurable breach. If you invent the rule on Sunday, you have created a statistic that will always flatter the past.

Optional context fields

Sleep, an argument, an unusually early start. Not medical information, not a diagnosis, and entirely optional — but occasionally they explain a cluster that the market data cannot.

Fields that make a cool-off rule measurable
  • The rule, written on the morning card with a timestamp
  • Streak position of every trade, computed from the book
  • Minutes between the losing exit and the next entry
  • Size of the next trade against your rolling median

Key takeaways

Your book already has these numbers. Import a broker CSV and the charts above draw themselves from your own closed trades.
Open the journal