Risk

The stop you wrote versus the stop that filled

Two prices tell a story that one price hides. Slippage, dragged stops, and the no-stop trade.

2025-09-30 · 6 min read

A broker tradebook shows one exit price. It cannot tell you whether that exit was the stop you planned, a stop you dragged, or a stop you never placed.

Add a second field and the whole review changes.

Plot planned against filled

On a scatter with planned exit on one axis and actual exit on the other, well-behaved trades hug the diagonal. Points that drift away from it are your slippage, your freezes, and your negotiations with yourself.

One quarter of data is usually enough to see whether the drift is random or always in the same direction.

Planned stop versus filled exit, 18 trades
−₹13k−₹10k−₹6k−₹2k₹1k Planned loss at stop (₹) Actual loss booked (₹)

The four points far below the line are the dragged stops. Illustrative journal data, not a live book and not a performance claim.

A missing stop is data too

Time-based exits, "I will check at 2pm", and pure hope all look identical in a CSV: an ordinary sell. A single no-stop checkbox lets you group them later and see what that habit costs in aggregate.

This is not a lecture about always using stops. Plenty of profitable books use time or structure instead. The point is that you can only study a decision you recorded.

Say which language the stop was in

On options this matters more than people admit. A 20-point index stop and a ₹20 premium stop are different instructions that happen to share a number.

On spreads, the stop belongs to the structure, not to one accidental leg.

Two exits that look the same in a CSV

Stop honoured

  • Planned −₹3,000
  • Filled −₹3,200
  • Slippage ₹200, market was thin
  • Rule intact

Stop dragged

  • Planned −₹3,000
  • Filled −₹9,200
  • No new information, just hope
  • Rule broken, flag it

Key takeaways

Your book already has these numbers. Import a broker CSV and the charts above draw themselves from your own closed trades.
Open the journal